More Pages: Barron Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100


Nice Pictures, but the information is very out of date
Disappointing and outdated; wonderful pictures though!
Amazon Parrots Complete Owner's Manual

General is right!
Great supplement for humanities CLEP
You need this book!I just took the new computerized Natural Sciences General exam.I took it on May 16th, 2002.
I reviewed information in this book, and Cracking the Clep, and Comex Books. THANK GOODNESS I HAD THIS BOOK. Every review I read said that that Cracking the Clep was best. After I studied that book, I thought I would Ace the test. The questions in Cracking the Clep was a lot easier than the ones on the new test.
When I was studying this book, I couldn't answer more than 60%-70% correctly. The material in this book was diverse and alot harder than the other books.
This turned out to be the KEY! Not one question in any of the books showed up on the test. NONE! However, since this book asked the broadest array of question, and had the broadest array of material, I was exposed to a vast expanse of what COULD be on the test. I learned the CONCEPTS. And That is the KEY to Passing.
I scored in the 94th Percentile. and finished the test 34 minutes early.
I do recommend Cracking the Clep as your first review. However, if you can get about 60%-70% of the answers right in this book, you should be well versed to pass the newer computer version of the Natural Sciences test. Get this book. Take the Practice Tests, and review your wrong answers.
7/18/02 Update ***
I used this book to study for the Social Science and History general exam also. I passed last week with 98% (percentile) in 42 minutes! -Before I studied, I knew virtually nothing of this subject nor Natural Sciences. This book, The companion book "Best review..., and Cracking the Clep (plus the Comex books) are all slightly different. However, If you know NOTHING about your subjects, these four books are essential. They are all you need.
I also just passed the English Comp with Essay using these books.
Remember, no matter what anyone says, NONE of these books will give you the answers directly on the test. What they do is expose you to general concepts, so many in fact, that when you see one on the test, you will have a good chance to choose the correct answer.
The CLEP is designed to be a general test. To pass, you have to know a little bit about a lot. This book, along with the others do just that. If you can pass the sample tests in this book with even 60% correct, using the scoring system in the book, you
can be assured that you will pass the clep. Don't waste your time at the library pouring over questionable material.
Use the above books. Read each. take the practice tests. Review your wrong answers only.
If you can get even 60% correct on all of the practice tests in this book, you will pass the Clep handily.
One final word: None of these books alone expose you to enough information if you previously did not know the subject. Use the books like this:
1. Best Review ... - Best general reading material
2. Cracking the Clep - Closest structure to the actual test, but
questions are very easy. Good confidense builder.
3. Best Test Prep (this book) - Hard diverse questions
4. Comex Books - Good Hybrid of all books, but not complete on
it's own.
If you use all four of these books, you will go into the tests with confidence and will score a lot higher than you would imagine.


horrible
Questions accurate of AP-style, but explanations are badThe Barron's book is strong in it's practice exams. I found the questions to be of the same style and difficulty as on the AP, especially the multiple choice. And for some of the easier chapters (vectors, 1-D motion, waves), the summaries aren't too bad although the information is a little muddled.
But that's all that's really good about this book. The answers for the practice questions are to difficult to explain and a lot of the time just plain-out incorrect. They might explain how to do it mathematically and show the calculations which would be completely incorrect. Or they'd write the incorrect equations. If you're a strong Physics student most of this shouldn't bother you, but there were a few questions where the method they used to solve the problem was entirely incorrect. Also when the book tries to explain the more complicated stuff, the language is just no basic and clear. And they introduce a lot of simplified versions of the common equations, obviously meant to increase speed, but mostly just confused me.
This was the only book I used to prepare for the exam so I don't know how the other prep guides are in comparison. But I wouldn't recommend this book.
Excellent review of the Physics B curriculum.Having used this book almost as my primary source for most of the fourth quarter, I have to say it does an excellent job of what it says it will -- helping a student prepare for the AP Physics B exam. From problem-solving strategies to excellent short summaries of each topic to sample exams to even a review of algebra, the book provides everything needed to succeed on the Physics B exam.
With a teacher who was out with a serious illness for most of the fourth quarter, I knew I'd need extra help if I was going to get through the AP exam. (It's one of six I took, so it's not like I haven't experienced the "fun" of these exams before). I picked up this book and found myself quite happy with it, and its review of dozens of test topics definitely helped me through both my physics class and the AP exam itself. In retrospect, I wouldn't have done as well as I did without this review guide.


The Lord of the Ring's (Collector's Edition)
The Epitome of Excellent on White Paper
Beautiful Story, Gorgeous EditionFor those who are looking for an attractive, permanent edition, this is it. The fifty Alan Lee paintings are gorgeous, and the more you look at them the more you realize how carefully Lee put them together to remain faithful to the vision and the detail of the text. It's obvious he loved the books as much as the rest of us do. A keeper.


Not much happening
Powerful images
A beautifully written coming-of-age novel

A Good Overview For The Test
This is a first rate book .
Best way to prepare...

couldn't slog through it
It's the easy way but somewhat incomplete wayBut there are some major errors and the book explains some concepts in a too much incomplete inductive way.
To begin with, the standing wave formula in the chapter 9 is different from the formula on many other college physics books.
This book says it Y=Asin(kx)sin(wt). But all other college physics books say it Y=Asin(kx)cos(wt).:-<
Another example, the answer to the exercise number 47 of the chapter 10 of this book, there is only one value for the x. Actually, there are two values. And if you seleted the same way with this book to solve this problem, you have to consider another value. Not just discard the extraneous root! Since the root value have to be interpreted to a value for the cosine as well as sine, because the quadratic equation formed exactly same with the case of cosine.
Additional example is the answer to the exercise number 57 of the chapter 10. The book omits two values. This error is very related with the concepts of chapter 12.
Furthermore, the book explains some concepts in a too much incomplete inductive way. An inductive way does not guarantee a theorem is true(well, the mathematical induction is an exception) . So it must used in a careful way. But this book abuse it. For example, see the exercise number 41 of the chapter 14. The book explains(actually make reader think by solving a problem) the existance of the polar triangle by just calculate a single instance of a spherical triangle. I think it must be presented by proving cosBcosC-sinBsinCcosa equals to -cosA by applying the law of cosines for sides and the fact sinBsinC becomes bc(1-(cosA)^2)/((sina)^2).Despite of the fact it may lead to a clumsy algebric experience.
In conclusion, although you may become friendly with the trigonometry functions with this book, you are still ambiguous and skeptical about some of the trigonometric concepts.You have to create your own exercises to make sure what you've learn from this book.:-<
It's a Decent Book

um...nothing beats expanding the mind
Helpful in Understanding a Complex BookWhile not all CliffsNotes are worth buying, in this case, it can enhance and encourage the reading process. They explain the many characters in two sections.
The first is not unlike what introduces many playbills. For example, for Sonia, it says "Sofya's nickname." Maybe that it is common in Russia, but it would have thrown me for a loop. For Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov, it says, "A poverty-stricken student who conceives a theory of the superman or extraordinary man as a justification or rationalization for his crime."
The second guide explains in a page or two the context and major concerns of only a few characters.
Because they have Russian names unfamiliar to most of us in the United States, their little guide will be handy to keep open as you read the actual book.
The chapter synopsis is also useful for teachers who are overwhelmed with responsibilities. I have used it for this reason with a private student. I had not read the work and needed to be up to speed quickly. The synopsis put the book in context, making expectation available to me as I read. This helped me know what was worth focusing on in our all-to-brief look at this classic.
Other sections explain motifs and arguments of Hegel and Nietzsche regarding the superman ideas presented. Lacking is a section on biblical references, which, for students without much biblical knowledge, will limit their appreciation of the depth of "Crime and Punishment." Judith Gunn's "Dostoyesky: Dreamer and Prophet" is a good follow-up for the student looking to understand Dostoyesky religious perspective and Russian nationalism.
I fully recommend "CliffsNotes Crime and Punishment" by James L. Roberts.
Anthony Trendl
Excellent preparation for understanding Roskolnikov's crimeThe Summary/Commentary section breaks the novel down by chapters and Roberts uses A-B-C notations to distinguish specific lines of analysis; I consider such signposting useful to students. As always, the best way to use these commentaries is to read them after the corresponding parts of the novel, rather than doing them all at once after (or before...) doing the reading. Roberts them explores the Extraordinary Man Theories of Hegel, Nietzsche and Raskolnikov in a short essay section students will certainly find provocative. The Character Review looks as Raskolnikov, Sonia, Svidrigailov, and Petrovitch while under Motifs he examines Confession, being "All Alone," the Square Yard of Space, Suffering and Fresh Air.
This is one of the better little yellow books with the black stripes, with its major strength being that Roberts provides his best analysis outside of the Summary/Commentary section. He also takes the time to develop his case on Structure, Characters and Motifs (not all of these books do). But above all, Roberts sets up the novel so that going into "Crime and Punishment" students are well prepared to deal with the major elements.


Inaccurate data or out of date materials.
a very good broad general overview with some mistakes
Not a bad job

Barron's How to prepare for the PSAT/ NMSQT mistakes
Not bad
It helped me--now it's helping my sister